March 9, 2026
John Trapp's wisdom
John Trapp, who lived from 1601 to 1669, wrote a commentary to the
Bible which is full of modern-day illustrations and witty remarks. Here
is one example from I Peter 4:3:
For the time past of our life may suffice us
We may every one say with Austin, Nimis sero te amavi Domine. It should be a burden to our souls that we begin no sooner to love God.
In lasciviousness, lusts, &c.
The true picture of a pagan conversation, which yet is too common among
those that call themselves Christians. The world is now grown perfectly
profane, and can play on the Lord's day without book [i.e. without
authority]; making it as Bacchus' orgies, rather than God's holy day,
with piping, dancing, drinking, drabbing [per 1828 Webster's, "keeping
company with lewd women"], &c. We may say as once Alsted of his
Germans, that if the Sabbath Day should be named according to their
observing of it, Daemoniacus potius quam Dominicus diceretur, it should be called not God's day, but the devil's.
Excess of wine
Gr. oinophlugia, or, red and rich faces, as they call them.
Revellings
Gr. komos, stinks, saith the
Syriac; drunkards are stinkards; as Luther called the Swenckfeldians,
stink-feldians, from the ill savour of their opinions. Tacitus tells us
that among the old Germans, it was no disgrace counted to continue drinking and spewing night and day, Diem noctemque continuare potando.
[Per the Greek-English
dictionary: "a nocturnal and riotous procession of half drunken and
frolicsome fellows who after supper parade through the streets with
torches and music in honour of Bacchus or some other deity, and sing
and play before houses of male and female friends; hence used generally
of feasts and drinking parties that are protracted till late at night
and indulge in revelry."]
Banquetings
Gr. potos, compotations, or
good fellow meetings; some render it bibbings, sippings, tipplings,
sitting long at it, though not to an alienation of the mind. How much
more when they leave not till they have drank the three "outs" first; viz. Wit out of the head, money out of the purse, and ale out of the pot!
And abominable idolatries
Some idolatries then, say the Papists, are not abominable. A sweet
inference. That all Papists are idolaters, Dr Reynolds hath plainly and
plentifully proved in his learned work De idololatria Romana,
never yet answered. Weston writeth that his head ached in reading it.
But what a poor shift is that of Vasquez, expressly to maintain that
the second commandment belonged to the Jews only; as holding it
impossible to answer our arguments against their image worship? Other
Popish writers utterly disannul the second commandment, making it a
member of the first; and so, retaining the words, they destroy the
sense and interpretation.
February 27, 2026
On the words "all" and "world" --
What are the limits?
In 1648, a famous theologian by the name of John Owen wrote a powerful
book about Christ's atonement, namely, just how far that atonement
reached -- to the whole world or to only the elect of God. Basically,
will everyone be saved, or only some... did Christ die for everyone, or
only for some... does God love all men, or only some? In other words,
which is true -- the doctrine of universal redemption or the doctrine
of particular redemption?
You can read Owen's work here.
But probably the best distillation of what Owen wrote can be found in
J. I. Packer's Introductory Essay
to the 1959 reprint of Owen's The
Death of Death in the Death of Christ. Read that intro carefully.
My thoughts? First of all, look at these verses and you will see how
the words "world" and "all" are used.
How
the word "all" is used in the New Testament - Authorized Version:
all 748, all things 170, every 117, all men 41, whosoever 31, everyone
28, whole 12, all manner of 11, every man 11, no+3756 9, every thing 7,
any 7, whatsoever 6, whosoever+3739+302 3, always+1223 3, daily+2250 2,
any thing 2, no+3361 2, not tr 7, misc 26; 1243
Mt 3:5 Then went out to him Jerusalem, and all Judaea, and all the
region round about Jordan,
Mt 10:22 And ye shall be hated of all [men] for my name's sake: but he
that endureth to the end shall be saved.
1Ti 4:10 For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we
trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of
those that believe.
2Pe 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count
slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should
perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Jas 1:5 If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, that giveth to
all [men] liberally, and upbraideth not; and it shall be given him.
2Ti 1:15 This thou knowest, that all they which are in Asia be turned
away from me; of whom are Phygellus and Hermogenes.
2Ti 4:16 At my first answer no man stood with me, but all [men] forsook
me: [I pray God] that it may not be laid to their charge.
Ro 1:7 To all that be in Rome, beloved of God, called [to be] saints:
Grace to you and peace from God our Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ.
Ro 1:8 First, I thank my God through Jesus Christ for you all, that
your faith is spoken of throughout the whole world.
Ro 5:18 Therefore as by the offence of one [judgment came] upon all men
to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one [the free gift
came] upon all men unto justification of life. 19 For as by one man's
disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall
many be made righteous.
Ro 11:26 And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There
shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness
from Jacob:
Ro 11:32 For God hath concluded them all in unbelief, that he might
have mercy upon all.
Ro 16:19 For your obedience is come abroad unto all [men]. I am glad
therefore on your behalf: but yet I would have you wise unto that which
is good, and simple concerning evil.
==========
Mark has a good number of "all" uses. And there is this important
verse, which clearly states the will of the Lord regarding His elect
and those without His electing purposes:
Mr 4:11-12
And he said unto them, Unto you it is given to know
the mystery of the kingdom of God: but unto them that are without, all
[these] things are done in parables: That seeing they may see, and not
perceive; and hearing they may hear, and not understand; lest at any
time they should be converted, and [their] sins should be forgiven them.
==========
From the Online Bible under Greek meaning of "all":
3956 πᾶς pas
including all the forms of declension; adj; TDNT-5:886,795; {See TDNT
604}
AV-all 748, all things 170, every 117, all men 41, whosoever 31,
everyone 28, whole 12, all manner of 11, every man 11, no + 3756 9,
every thing 7, any 7, whatsoever 6, whosoever + 3739 + 302 3, always +
1223 3, daily + 2250 2, any thing 2, no + 3361 2, not tr 7, misc 26;
1243
1) individually
1a) each, every, any, all, the whole, everyone, all things, everything
2) collectively
2a) some of all types
"All" is also used as a synecdoche in the NT. From Matthew Poole's Commentary on I Pet. 4:3:
"The churches to which he wrote might be made up of Jews and Gentiles, and the apostle may, by a synecdoche, ascribe that to all in common, which yet is to be understood only of a part."
Here is Charles Spurgeon's clarification on the meaning of "all":
Now, beloved, when you hear any
one laughing or jeering at a limited atonement, you may tell him this.
General atonement is like a great wide bridge with only half an arch;
it does not go across the stream: it only professes to go half way; it
does not secure the salvation of anybody. Now, I had rather put my foot
upon a bridge as narrow as Hungerford, which went all the way across,
than on a bridge that was as wide as the world, if it did not go all
the way across the stream. I am told it is my duty to say that all men
have been redeemed, and I am told that there is a Scriptural warrant
for it? "Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due
time."
Now, that looks like a very, very great argument indeed on the other
side of the question. For instance, look here. "The whole world is gone
after Him." Did all the world go after Christ? "Then went all Judea,
and were baptized of him in Jordan." Was all Judea, or all Jerusalem
baptized in Jordan? "Ye are of God, little children," and "the whole
world lieth in the wicked one." Does "the whole world" there mean
everybody? If so, how was it, then, that there were some who were "of
God?"
The words "world" and "all" are used in seven or eight senses in
Scripture; and it is very rarely that "all" means all persons, taken
individually. The words are generally used to signify that Christ has
redeemed some of all sorts? some Jews, some Gentiles, some rich, some
poor, and has not restricted His redemption to either Jew or Gentile.
-- Particular Redemption by C. H.
Spurgeon, Sermon No. 181, New Park Pulpit, Vol. 4, p. 135,136.
Similarly, a look at the word for "world" in Greek, κόσμος kosmos:
How
the word "world" (kosmos) was used by the Apostle John:
58 times in the Gospel of John (152 times in entire New Testament)
Strong's Concordance Greek number = 2889
Joh 1:9 That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh
into the world <2889>.
Joh 1:10 He was in the world <2889>, and the world <2889>
was made by him, and the world <2889> knew him not.
Joh 1:29 The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith,
Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world
<2889>. {taketh away: or, beareth}
Joh 3:16 For God so loved the world <2889>, that he gave his only
begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but
have everlasting life.
Joh 3:17 For God sent not his Son into the world <2889> to
condemn the world <2889>; but that the world <2889> through
him might be saved.
Joh 3:19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the
world <2889>, and men loved darkness rather than light, because
their deeds were evil.
Joh 4:42 And said unto the woman, Now we believe, not because of thy
saying: for we have heard him ourselves, and know that this is indeed
the Christ, the Saviour of the world <2889>.
Joh 6:14 Then those men, when they had seen the miracle that Jesus did,
said, This is of a truth that prophet that should come into the world
<2889>.
Joh 6:33 For the bread of God is he which cometh down from heaven, and
giveth life unto the world <2889>.
Joh 6:51 I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man
eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will
give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world
<2889>.
Joh 7:4 For there is no man that doeth any thing in secret, and he
himself seeketh to be known openly. If thou do these things, shew
thyself to the world <2889>.
Joh 7:7 The world <2889> cannot hate you; but me it hateth,
because I testify of it, that the works thereof are evil.
Joh 8:12 Then spake Jesus again unto them, saying, I am the light of
the world <2889>: he that followeth me shall not walk in
darkness, but shall have the light of life.
Joh 8:23 And he said unto them, Ye are from beneath; I am from above:
ye are of this world <2889>; I am not of this world <2889>.
Joh 8:26 I have many things to say and to judge of you: but he that
sent me is true; and I speak to the world <2889> those things
which I have heard of him.
Joh 9:5 As long as I am in the world <2889>, I am the light of
the world <2889>.
Joh 9:39 And Jesus said, For judgment I am come into this world
<2889>, that they which see not might see; and that they which
see might be made blind.
Joh 10:36 Say ye of him, whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into
the world <2889>, Thou blasphemest; because I said, I am the Son
of God?
Joh 11:9 Jesus answered, Are there not twelve hours in the day? If any
man walk in the day, he stumbleth not, because he seeth the light of
this world <2889>.
Joh 11:27 She saith unto him, Yea, Lord: I believe that thou art the
Christ, the Son of God, which should come into the world <2889>.
Joh 12:19 The Pharisees therefore said among themselves, Perceive ye
how ye prevail nothing? behold, the world <2889> is gone after
him.
Joh 12:25 He that loveth his life shall lose it; and he that hateth his
life in this world <2889> shall keep it unto life eternal.
Joh 12:31 Now is the judgment of this world <2889>: now shall the
prince of this world <2889> be cast out.
Joh 12:46 I am come a light into the world <2889>, that whosoever
believeth on me should not abide in darkness.
Joh 12:47 And if any man hear my words, and believe not, I judge him
not: for I came not to judge the world <2889>, but to save the
world <2889>.
Joh 13:1 Now before the feast of the passover, when Jesus knew that his
hour was come that he should depart out of this world <2889> unto
the Father, having loved his own which were in the world <2889>,
he loved them unto the end.
Joh 14:17 Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world <2889> cannot
receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know
him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you.
Joh 14:19 Yet a little while, and the world <2889> seeth me no
more; but ye see me: because I live, ye shall live also.
Joh 14:22 Judas saith unto him, not Iscariot, Lord, how is it that thou
wilt manifest thyself unto us, and not unto the world <2889>?
Joh 14:27 Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you: not as the
world <2889> giveth, give I unto you. Let not your heart be
troubled, neither let it be afraid.
Joh 14:30 Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of
this world <2889> cometh, and hath nothing in me.
Joh 14:31 But that the world <2889> may know that I love the
Father; and as the Father gave me commandment, even so I do. Arise, let
us go hence.
Joh 15:18 If the world <2889> hate you, ye know that it hated me
before it hated you.
Joh 15:19 If ye were of the world <2889>, the world <2889>
would love his own: but because ye are not of the world <2889>,
but I have chosen you out of the world <2889>, therefore the
world <2889> hateth you.
Joh 16:8 And when he is come, he will reprove the world <2889> of
sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment: {reprove: or, convince}
Joh 16:11 Of judgment, because the prince of this world <2889> is
judged.
Joh 16:20 Verily, verily, I say unto you, That ye shall weep and
lament, but the world <2889> shall rejoice: and ye shall be
sorrowful, but your sorrow shall be turned into joy.
Joh 16:21 A woman when she is in travail hath sorrow, because her hour
is come: but as soon as she is delivered of the child, she remembereth
no more the anguish, for joy that a man is born into the world
<2889>.
Joh 16:28 I came forth from the Father, and am come into the world
<2889>: again, I leave the world <2889>, and go to the
Father.
Joh 16:33 These things I have spoken unto you, that in me ye might have
peace. In the world <2889> ye shall have tribulation: but be of
good cheer; I have overcome the world <2889>.
Joh 17:5 And now, O Father, glorify thou me with thine own self with
the glory which I had with thee before the world <2889> was.
Joh 17:6 I have manifested thy name unto the men which thou gavest me
out of the world <2889>: thine they were, and thou gavest them
me; and they have kept thy word.
Joh 17:9 I pray for them: I pray not for the world <2889>, but
for them which thou hast given me; for they are thine.
Joh 17:11 And now I am no more in the world <2889>, but these are
in the world <2889>, and I come to thee. Holy Father, keep
through thine own name those whom thou hast given me, that they may be
one, as we are.
Joh 17:12 While I was with them in the world <2889>, I kept them
in thy name: those that thou gavest me I have kept, and none of them is
lost, but the son of perdition; that the scripture might be fulfilled.
Joh 17:13 And now come I to thee; and these things I speak in the world
<2889>, that they might have my joy fulfilled in themselves.
Joh 17:14 I have given them thy word; and the world <2889> hath
hated them, because they are not of the world <2889>, even as I
am not of the world <2889>.
Joh 17:15 I pray not that thou shouldest take them out of the world
<2889>, but that thou shouldest keep them from the evil.
Joh 17:16 They are not of the world <2889>, even as I am not of
the world <2889>.
Joh 17:18 As thou hast sent me into the world <2889>, even so
have I also sent them into the world <2889>.
Joh 17:21 That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I
in thee, that they also may be one in us: that the world <2889>
may believe that thou hast sent me.
Joh 17:23 I in them, and thou in me, that they may be made perfect in
one; and that the world <2889> may know that thou hast sent me,
and hast loved them, as thou hast loved me.
Joh 17:24 Father, I will that they also, whom thou hast given me, be
with me where I am; that they may behold my glory, which thou hast
given me: for thou lovedst me before the foundation of the world
<2889>.
Joh 17:25 O righteous Father, the world <2889> hath not known
thee: but I have known thee, and these have known that thou hast sent
me.
Joh 18:20 Jesus answered him, I spake openly to the world <2889>;
I ever taught in the synagogue, and in the temple, whither the Jews
always resort; and in secret have I said nothing.
Joh 18:36 Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world <2889>:
if my kingdom were of this world <2889>, then would my servants
fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my
kingdom not from hence.
Joh 18:37 Pilate therefore said unto him, Art thou a king then? Jesus
answered, Thou sayest that I am a king. To this end was I born, and for
this cause came I into the world <2889>, that I should bear
witness unto the truth. Every one that is of the truth heareth my voice.
Joh 21:25 And there are also many other things which Jesus did, the
which, if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the
world <2889> itself could not contain the books that should be
written. Amen.
================================
18 times in the Epistles of John:
1Jo 2:2 And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only,
but also for the sins of the whole world <2889>.
1Jo 2:15 Love not the world <2889>, neither the things that are
in the world <2889>. If any man love the world <2889>, the
love of the Father is not in him.
1Jo 2:16 For all that is in the world <2889>, the lust of the
flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the
Father, but is of the world <2889>.
1Jo 2:17 And the world <2889> passeth away, and the lust thereof:
but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever.
1Jo 3:1 Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us,
that we should be called the sons of God: therefore the world
<2889> knoweth us not, because it knew him not.
1Jo 3:13 Marvel not, my brethren, if the world <2889> hate you.
1Jo 3:17 But whoso hath this world痴 <2889> good, and seeth his
brother have need, and shutteth up his bowels of compassion from him,
how dwelleth the love of God in him?
1Jo 4:1 Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether
they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the
world <2889>.
1Jo 4:3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come
in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist,
whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it
in the world <2889>.
1Jo 4:4 Ye are of God, little children, and have overcome them: because
greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world <2889>.
1Jo 4:5 They are of the world <2889>: therefore speak they of the
world <2889>, and the world <2889> heareth them.
1Jo 4:9 In this was manifested the love of God toward us, because that
God sent his only begotten Son into the world <2889>, that we
might live through him.
1Jo 4:14 And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son
to be the Saviour of the world <2889>.
1Jo 4:17 Herein is our love made perfect, that we may have boldness in
the day of judgment: because as he is, so are we in this world
<2889>. {our love: Gr. love with us}
1Jo 5:4 For whatsoever is born of God overcometh the world
<2889>: and this is the victory that overcometh the world
<2889>, even our faith. {is born: Gr. has been born}
1Jo 5:5 Who is he that overcometh the world <2889>, but he that
believeth that Jesus is the Son of God?
1Jo 5:19 And we know that we are of God, and the whole world
<2889> lieth in wickedness.
2Jo 1:7 For many deceivers are entered into the world <2889>, who
confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver
and an antichrist.
Here are some assorted points I think are important to consider re
Calvinistic ideas on the atonement:
Thoughts
on Calvinism
It really should not be called by his name, for it is a theology going
back to Christ's teachings, and even from the beginning of the Word.
God has always been the Giver of grace -- creating light, creating a
new heart, giving life to that which was dead (inanimate), resurrecting
that which was without power to live. Calvin codified it, so to speak,
that we may in an organized fashion see the sovereignty of God in man's
salvation, and man's utter dependence upon God for everything.
For this is the very fundamental issue -- how are we saved, i.e. how
are we to preach to Gospel so that people are brought to a saving
knowledge of Christ. Most today say man has the will to be saved and
can decide. Traditional teaching says that only God can save and He has
chosen who will in fact be saved, that man is incapable to doing
anything toward his salvation. Therefore it is all of God's grace, from
beginning to end.
To illustrate, in the Bible, salvation is compared to the following:
- Creation -- God did
not co-create anything. He spoke it into existence by Himself.
Christians are called a "new creation," that which God created out of
nothing, by His Word. There was no decision on our part in this
process. Man initiates nothing.
- Darkness to Light
-- On Day One, God created light. We were once darkness, but now we are
light, because God gave us light. Our role was totally passive.
Self-enlightenment is an impossibility. Just as the theory of evolution
takes God out of the cause, so does Arminian theology make the cause
center in man. The darkness in natural man refers also to his blindness
and deafness (Matt. 13:15, Acts 26:18, Eph. 4:18), where God alone can
open eyes and minds and turn them from darkness to light that they may
see and understand the Gospel.
- New birth -- No one
who is not born again can go to heaven. God's people were given life, a
new life, without any thought on their part of wanting to be born.
Nothing living can be made from something dead. Just as we acknowledge
God giving us our children, so we acknowledge God making us His
children (rf. adoption).
- Resurrection -- We
who were dead are risen with Christ to a new life. Absolutely no
thought or words or action on our part produced life in us. It was all
of God, from the beginning, and so will be to eternity.
So what is the gripe against Calvinism?
Perhaps it is man's natural abhorrence of God chosing some and
rejecting others, electing some to eternal life, while leaving others
to perish eternally (aka reprobation). Especially hard to accept is
that God discriminates, something that goes against liberal thought
today. The height of absurdity perhaps to modern thinkers is that God
would create someone only to destroy him.
Perhaps it is the fact that man has nothing to do with his own
salvation... it is all of God, all of grace, from start to finish.
Perhaps it is the desire of evangelists and preachers to make the
Gospel more easily acceptable, talk about God's love for everyone
rather than God's wrath.
Does ALL mean ALL? Who are the all of the Scriptures?
They are the all who experience these aspects of God's plan of
salvation:
Substitution:
We should have been the victim, but Christ became our substitute, dying
in our place vicariously.
Imputation: Our sins are
imputed to Christ, and His righteousness imputed to us.
Propitiation: We were
guilty and condemned to death, under God's wrath,
yet Christ appeased that wrath forever by satisfying His Father's
divine justice.
Redemption: Christ became
our surety, paying our debt, satisfying the demand of Almighty God.
Justification: Christ,
through His death and through His gift of faith to His chosen ones, has
eternally justified us before God, the Judge of all mankind.
Adoption: God has,
through the sacrifice and the merits of His Son, made us His children.
The Great ONLY's:
Sola
Scriptura: The Bible alone is the source of our beliefs and our
guide.
Sola Gratia: God's grace
alone is what has given us life and all that pertains to godliness.
Sola Fide: The faith that
Christ gives to us is the basis of our belief in God for our salvation
and Christian walk.
Timothy Pietsch often remarked, "No one will get to heaven because
Christ died." True because without Christ's resurrection, our faith is
in vain. Arminians will say that Christ died for everyone, but not that
He rose from the dead for everyone.
Does God love everyone?
The Word says that the carnal mind is enmity against God. The
unregenerate man hates God! That is where the emphasis should be
placed, for no one can determine who God loves UNTIL that person
becomes a believer. But we DO know that before that happens, man is
UNDER God's wrath.
A good study re God's will in saving His people is how the apostles
were chosen, especially how God dealt with Paul. They were all chosen
directly by Christ. No one had to preach to them that God loved them
and had done everything possible for them in order that they would
follow Christ. God's sovereignty over their lives prevailed.
The Five Points of Gomarus and
Calvinism
We would not have these if it weren't for the Remonstrant's Five
Points. See Synod of Dort 1618... Gomarus vs. Episcopius. Ten years
earlier, Gomarus had debated against Arminius himself. Search here on
"gomarus" (also search on "calvin" for a lot of additional info):
https://wesinjerd.com/archaebibliophilia/New_Finds_from_Old_Treasures_2014.html
The Five Points could have been called the Five Points of Gomarus, or
at least the Five Points of the Contra-Remonstrants.
But the controversy goes back further, to Augustine and Pelagius, and
before that even, with the Arians. And way before that... Cain? Natural
man will always put himself first and argue his case as primary mover
in salvation, believing his way to find favor in God's eyes as the way
to be saved from punishment. Ultimately, therefore, it is man who wants
to freely decide how he is to live rather than seeking guidance from
and depending upon God's Word.
Some say they are "Four Point Calvinists," that is, they hold to all
the points except limited atonement, as they don't believe God would
limit salvation to anyone, that He loves everyone and wants everyone to
be saved. There are Calvinists, though, who prefer the term "Particular
Redemption" to "Limited Atonement."
This 3rd point (of TULIP) is
probably the MOST controversial issue in the whole scheme:
Does God love everyone without exception? Did Jesus die for all men
past, present and future? Though many accept a particular election,
that God has a people whom He has chosen to eternal life, they will say
that God foreknew who would believe on Him. What they mean is that God
predestinated only those He knew would choose Him, which if true, would
mean their salvation is based on their choice, with God's choice of
them relegated to second place.
The second most controversial is the 1st point: Is man's will
unaffected by his depravity, i.e. is he in his natural state able to
believe in Christ for salvation? A yes answer is what has produced the
easy-believism of today, that you just have to "make a decision" and
"accept the Lord as your Saviour." It is as if there are two sides of
man, as the story goes, the good side (God) and the bad side (the
devil) -- to which of the two will you yield? This, if true, would
place God on equal footing as Satan, making them opponents in the fight
over man's soul, and whoever you decide for will win the battle.
Re choosing: Natural man
does not like God choosing some and not choosing others. He thinks it
unfair if God leaves some out of the chance to have eternal life. So,
therefore, since his concept of God is One Who is all-benevolent and
merciful and bestows His grace, His love, upon anyone and everyone,
then of course, it will then be up to all those people to either choose
or reject such grace.
However, if this were truly the case, then God is forced to wait until
someone chooses Him before He can give light, create a new heart, a new
life, changing that person from dead to alive. The biblical order is
reverse -- God gives light to the understanding, life to the dead soul,
a new heart, in fact, creating a new person, by granting that person
faith and repentance. THEN that person repents to God and is born
again, saved from the wrath to come and from dead works, walking in
newness of life.
There is no choice involved, as the Arminian scheme would have it. What
decision-making process is there in fleeing from a burning building or
grabbing onto a life preserver? You want to be saved! You MUST be
saved, or you will die. It is that seed of faith planted in the good
soil that will produce a response, and produce a fruitful life. And
only God can make the heart a place of good soil, and make His chosen
ones responsive to His drawing them.
NOTE: There are two roads -- the broad and the narrow. MANY are on the
broad, and FEW on the narrow. But MANY will strive to enter the narrow
and will NOT be able to! What good does "free will" do in those cases?
So you see that "free will" does not accomplish anything for those
people even though they exercise it.
NOTE: It is God's will that is most important. The question one should
ask is this -- Will everyone God loves be saved? If not, why not? If
God wills that all be saved, then they will, right? What is your answer?
Re free will: We talk
about freedom and how bad a totalitarian and dictatorial government is,
yet in that society there is no free will -- the citizens must obey or
else. Where is free will then? Then there is the other side of the
coin, how a free society can do whatever it wants. Well, no it can't.
You just can't say to a police officer that you can do as you feel,
nobody can tell you what to do, my body my choice, etc. But the bottom
line is you'd BETTER obey or ELSE! So how does free will operate in
that society?
Re God's universal love,
Christ's universal death:
If it is true that God's love extends to all mankind, and Christ's
death was for all mankind (past, present and future), then all mankind
will be saved, i.e. accounted as worthy in His sight, being made
righteous by Christ's substitutionary death. They are no longer held
accountable and deserving hell for eternity, but rather citizens of the
Kingdom of God. Either God's love and Christ's death & resurrection
results in eternal salvation for all, or modern evangelism is nothing
but double-speak by telling people God loves them and Christ died for
them but they may go to hell anyway.
From A Defense of Calvinism by Spurgeon:
The late lamented Mr. Denham has
put, at the foot of his portrait, a most admirable text, "Salvation is
of the Lord." That is just an epitome of Calvinism. It is the sum and
substance of it. If anyone should ask me what I mean by a Calvinist, I
would reply, "He is one who says, Salvation is of the Lord." I cannot
find in Scripture any other doctrine than this. It is the essence of
the Bible, "He only is my rock and my salvation." Tell me anything
contrary to this truth, and it will be a heresy. Tell me a heresy, and
I shall find its essence here, that it has departed from this great,
this fundamental, this rock-truth, "God is my rock and my salvation."
What is the heresy of Rome, but the addition of something to the
perfect merits of Jesus Christ, the bringing in of the works of the
flesh to assist in our justification? And what is the heresy of
Arminianism, but the addition of something to the work of the Redeemer?
Every heresy, if brought to the touchstone, will discover itself here.
I have my own private opinion that there is no such thing as preaching
Christ, and Him crucified, unless we preach what nowadays is called
Calvinism. It is a nickname to call it Calvinism. Calvinism is the
Gospel and nothing else. I do not believe we can preach the Gospel if
we do not preach justification by faith, without works nor unless we
preach the sovereignty of God in His dispensation of grace, nor unless
we exalt the electing, unchangeable, eternal, immutable, conquering
love of JEHOVAH. Nor do I think we can preach the Gospel unless we base
it upon the special and particular redemption of His elect and chosen
people which Christ worked out upon the cross. Nor can I comprehend a
Gospel which lets saints fall away after they are called, and allows
the children of God to be burned in the fires of damnation after having
once believed in Jesus. Such a Gospel I abhor.
Re Calvinism by Downing:
4. The dynamic principle is the
infallibility or effectual working of saving grace. Divine grace is
more than a mere principle; it is a power -- a Divine dynamic. The
Divine, redemptive purpose is eternal and infallible; the working of
saving grace is wholly free and sovereign. This, according to Warfield,
is the distinguishing mark of Calvinism, rather than predestination, as
both Arminianism and Calvinism presuppose some idea of predestination:
These five points affirmed absolute predestination, particular
redemption, total depravity, irresistible grace, and the perseverance
of the saints. If a single distinguishing principle is to be
discriminated among these, it will not be found in "predestination,"
but rather in "irresistible grace"...The distinguishing mark, of
Calvinism as over against all other systems lies in its doctrines of
"efficacious grace," which, it teaches, is the undeserved, and
therefore gratuitous, and therefore sovereign mercy of God, by which he
efficaciously brings whom he will into salvation. Calvinism is
specifically the theology of grace; and all are properly Calvinists who
confess the absolute sovereignty of God in the distribution of his
saving mercy.
Christopher Ness was a valiant defender of those precious doctrines of
grace; he also had a great influence on the famous Bible expositor,
Matthew Henry. See this
excerpt from his work, An
Antidote against Arminianism (1700). His work on Bible History
was recommended by Charles Spurgeon, calling it "a treasure." Though he
may look glum in the illustration below, he was a Nonconformist
preacher who stood faithful to God's Word in the midst of persecution
in England.

Christopher Ness (1621–1705)
What are the practical
applications for all this? How are we to view those around us who are
not believers in Christ?
- They are under God's wrath and must turn from their wicked
ways. To tell them that God loves them, that Jesus died for them, that
God has done everything He can and it is up to them to decide, is NOT
the biblical way to evangelize.
- There are some among them that are God's elect. God will
absolutely save them, for those whom He has predestinated WILL be
conformed to the image of His Son and God will call His elect and
justify them. It is ONLY then that we will know they are Christians, by
their godly living because of being conformed to Christ's image.
- Since we do not know who God's elect are, we pray for all
those with whom we come in contact, that God will give them LIGHT in
their darkness and open their minds to the truth of God's Word, His Son
Jesus Christ.
February 25, 2026
Early Zionism and Anti-Semitism
It seems that the
designation [Zionism], to distinguish the movement from the activity of
the Chovevei Zion, was first used by Matthias Acher (Birnbaum) in his
paper "Selbstemancipation," 1886.
The belief that the Messiah will collect the scattered hosts (לארשי לש
ויתוילג) is often expressed in Talmudic and midrashic writings; even
though more universalistic tendencies made themselves felt, especially
in parts of the Apocryphal literature. Among Jewish philosophers the
theory held that the Messiah b. Joseph "will gather the children of
Israel around him, march to Jerusalem, and there, after overcoming the
hostile powers, re-establish the Temple-worship and set up his own
dominion."
This has remained the doctrine of Orthodox Judaism; as Friedländer
expresses it in his "Jewish Religion":
"There are some theologians
who assume the Messianic period to be the most perfect state of
civilization, but do not believe in the
restoration of the kingdom of David, the rebuilding of the Temple, or
the repossession of Palestine by the Jews.
They altogether reject the national hope of the Jews. These theologians
either misinterpret or wholly ignore the teachings of the Bible and the
divine promises made through the men of God."
The Reform wing of the Synagogue, however, rejects this doctrine; and
the Conference of Rabbis that sat in Frankfort-on-the-Main July 15-28,
1845, decided to eliminate from the
ritual "the prayers for the return to the land of our forefathers and
for the restoration of the Jewish state."
The Philadelphia Conference, Nov. 3–6, 1869, adopted as the first
section of its statement of principles the following: "The Messianic
aim of Israel is not the restoration
of the old Jewish state under a descendant of David,
involving a second separation from the nations of the earth, but the
union of all the children of God in the confession of the unity of God,
so as to realize the unity of all rational creatures, and their call to
moral sanctification."
This was reaffirmed at the Pittsburg Conference, Nov. 16-18, 1885, in
the following words: "We consider ourselves no longer a nation, but a
religious community; and we therefore
expect neither a return to Palestine, nor a sacrificial worship under
the sons of Aaron, nor the restoration of any of the laws concerning a
Jewish state."
-- From: The Jewish Encyclopedia VOL 12
TAL-ZWE (1905, 1909)
|
However, in spite of these early "rejections," there still remained a
concerted effort to establish a Jewish state. Here are some of those
efforts:
- An island in the Republic
of Venice in the mid-1500's to which European Jews could
emigrate.
- False Messiah Shabbethai Zebi sought to restore the Jews to
Palestine in the
mid-1600's.
- The son of August II of Poland wanted to make himself king
of a Jewish state in South America in 1749. In later years, Argentina became prominent as a
possible location (Herzl).
- Robinson in the US wanted to make a Jewish settlement in
the upper Mississippi and Missouri
territory in 1819.
- Mordecai Noah in 1845 proclaimed his views re the return of
the Jews to Palestine with a
plan to establish a settlement called Ararat
on Grand Island in the Niagara River.
- Frankel in 1868 advised purchasing from Turkey a Jewish
state in Palestine,
but admitted: "Should Palestine prove to be impossible, we must seek
elsewhere in any part of the globe some fixed home for the Jews."
- Henry Dunant (founder of Geneva Convention) founded two
societies, the International
Palestine Society and the Syrian and Palestine Colonization Society
in 1876, aiming at, in the words of Luzzatto: "Palestine must be colonized and
worked by the Jews in order that it may live again commercially and
agriculturally."
- In the 1800's, the Rothschilds were asked several times to
help finance land purchases in and
around Palestine for a Jewish state.
- Oliphant proposed colonizing "the Jewish proletariat of Poland, Lithuania, Rumania, and Asiatic
Turkey," but failed to obtain the sultan's permission.
- Influenced by Moses Hess, the German Jew Kalischer formed a
Palestine colonization
society in Frankfort in 1861, with many Orthodox rabbis engaged
in this "holy cause."
- Ben Yehudah proposed the colonization of Palestine
in a number of articles in 1879, and others wrote about the same
desires, which influenced Christian writers to advocate similar ideas,
thereby becoming a global issue; many colonization organizations such
as the Federation of American Zionists
were formed (in 1905 had 238 societies in the US; the Knights of Zion of Chicago had 80
societies).
- Work begins in first colony in Palestine in 1879, though Turkish
authorities made it difficult for Jews to enter Palestine.
Palestine, according to
the Mishnah, is "the holiest of all
countries." Jewish scholars have said:
"The Holy Temple built or
destroyed, the Shekinah never moved from that place, as God promised at
the dedication of the Temple."
"One who walks a distance of 4 cubits in Palestine may be confident of
a share in the future world."
"The merit of living in Palestine equals the merit of observing all of
the commandments."
"Zionism is a modern development of the ancient regard for Palestine."
"To be buried in Palestine is like being buried under the altar... All
sins are considered absolved for the Jew who is buried in Palestine."
"Palestinian dust put on the eyes, navel, and between the legs of the
dead outside the Holy Land is equivalent to burying the body in
Palestine."
-- From: "Holiness of
Palestine," Jewish Encyclopedia
|
There is also a short entry regarding "Anti-Semitism"
-- the Society of Jews was founded in London in 1896 to help combat
anti-semitism, and the First Zionist Congress was to be held in 1898 in
Munich (later actually held in Vienna). Kohler remarked in opposition
to Zionism: "The mission of the Jew is not only spiritual or religious
in character; it is social and intellectual as well, and the true Zionism demands of the Jews to be
martyrs in the cause of truth and justice and peace until the
Lord is one and the world one."
Most interesting is the protest by German and American rabbis to the
founding of a Palestinian state:
The
attempts of the Zionists to found a Jewish national state in Palestine
are contrary to the Messianic promises of Judaism as laid down in Holy
Writ and in the later religious authorities; secondly, that
Judaism demands of its adherents to serve the state in which they live
and in every way to further its national interests; thirdly, that no
opposition thereto can be seen in the noble plan to colonize Palestine
with Jewish agriculturists, because that plan has no connection with
the founding of a national state. In the same spirit the Conference of
American Rabbis, which met at Richmond, Va., on Dec. 31, 1898, declared
itself as opposed to the whole Zionist movement on the ground (as one
of the members stated) "that America
was the Jews' Jerusalem and Washington their Zion."
A Berlin professor and leader of liberal Jews, Ludwig Geiger, said:
"...the German Jew is a German in his national peculiarities, and Zion
is for him the land only of the past, not of the future." Jewish
professors at Chicago's Hebrew Union
College
remarked in 1899 that the Zionists were "traitors, hypocrites, or
fantastic fools whose thoughts, sentiments, and actions are in constant
contradiction to one another," "Zionism is an abnormal eruption of
perverted sentiment," the "Zionistic agitation contradicts everything
that is typical of Jews and Judaism," and that the "Zionistic movement
is a mark of ingenuity, and does not come out of the heart of Judaism,
either ancient or contemporary."
On the American side, the Second Congress held in Vienna in 1898 saw a
six-fold increase in American Zionist organizations attending. Sec.
John Hay (former ambassador in Constantinople) said in 1904 that Zionism was in his opinion "quite
consistent with American patriotism."
The Zionist flag was flown at the St. Louis Exposition in 1904 ("blue
and white stripes, with a 'Magen Dawid' [Star of David] in the center").
The first Jewish Congress was held in Palestine in 1903. The Seventh
Congress was held in Basel in 1905, and declared that it "stands firmly
by the fundamental principle of the Basel Program, namely, 'The establishment of a legally secured,
publicly recognized home for the Jewish people in Palestine,'
and it rejects, either as an end or as a means of colonizing, activity
outside Palestine and its adjacent lands." The largest voting faction
in the Congress general body were the so-called Ziyyone Zionists who
believed that "the diplomatic actions of Herzl have proven a failure...
demands immediate work in Palestine, without waiting for the granting
of a charter... land there should be
bought at once."
Zionistic societies sprung up throughout the world by the early 20th
century, e.g. the Shanghai Zionist Association, the Dr. Herzl East
Africa Zionist Association in Nairobi, societies in Nagasaki, in Tokyo,
and among US servicemen in the Philippines.
Much of Zionism -- perhaps its major theme -- deals with eschatology,
that the Jew will inherit the earth when the Messiah comes, that it is
their "divine right" to occupy that part of the Middle East now called
Israel. This is where the controversy must focus today... the Messiah,
Jesus Christ, has already come, and His message to the Jews is the same
as when He first preached the gospel in the Holy Land: "The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of
God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel." (Mark 1:15)
February 10, 2026
Beware of Thomas Edison's...
Aerophone!
THE
AEROPHONE
March 25, 1878
Something ought to be done to Mr. EDISON, and there is a growing
conviction that it had better be done with a hemp rope. Mr. EDISON has
invented too many things, and almost without exception they are things
of the most deleterious character. He has been addicted to electricity
for many years, and it is not very long ago that he became notorious
for having discovered a new force, though he has since kept it
carefully concealed, either upon his person or elsewhere. Recently he
invented the phonograph, a
machine that catches the lightest whisper of conversation and stores it
up so that at any future time it can be brought out, to the confusion
of the original speaker. This machine will eventually destroy all
confidence between man and man, and render more dangerous than ever
woman's want of confidence in woman. No
man can feel sure that wherever he may be there is not a concealed
phonograph remorseless gathering up his remarks and ready to reproduce
them at some future date, even in the bosom of his family, to
express any but most innocuous and colorless views? and what woman when
calling on a female friend, and waiting for the latter to make her
appearance in the drawing-room, will dare to express her opinion of the
wrotched taste displayed in the furniture, or the hideous appearance of
the family photographs?
In the days of persecution and espionage it was said, though with
poetical exaggeration, that the walls had ears. Thanks to Mr. EDISON's
perverted ingenuity, this has not only become a literal truth, but
every shelf, closet, or floor may now have its concealed phonographic
ears. No young man will venture to carry on a private conversation with
a young lady, lest he should be filling a secret phonograph with
evidence that, in a breach of promise suit, would secure an immediate
verdict against him, and our very small boys will fear to express
themselves with childish freedom, lest the phonograph should report
them as having lightly used the name of "gosh," or as having threatened
to "bust the snoot" of the long-suffering governess. The phonograph
was, at the time of its invention, the most terrible example of
depraved ingenuity which the world had seen; but Mr. EDISON has since
reached a still more conspicuous peak of scientific infamy by inventing
the aerophone—an instrument far
more devastating in its effects and fraught with the destruction of
human society.
The aerophone is apparently a modification of the phonograph. In fact,
it is a phonograph which converts whispers into roars. If, for example,
you mention, within hearing of the aerophone, that you regard Mr. HAYES
as the greatest and best man that America has yet produced, that
atrocious instrument may overwhelm you with shame by repeating your
remark in a tone that can be heard no less than four miles. Mr. Edison,
with characteristic effrontery, represents this as a useful and
beneficent invention. He says that an aerophone can be attached to a
locomotive, and that with its aid the engineer can request persons to
"look out for the locomotive" who are nearing a railway crossing four
miles distant from the train. He also boasts that he will attach an
aerophone to the gigantic statue of "Liberty," which France is to
present to this country, provided we will raise money enough to pay for
it, and that the statue will thus be able to welcome incoming vessels
in the Lower Bay, and to warn them not to come up to the City in case
Mr. STANLEY MATTHEWS is delivering an oration on the currency, or Mr.
COX is making a comic speech at Tammany Hall. Were the aerophone to be
confined strictly to these uses, it might prove a comparatively
unobjectionable instrument; but no man can loose a whirlwind and
guarantee that its ravages shall be confined to Chicago, or to some
other place where it may do positive good.
This country has long suffered
from excessive talk.
Had nine-tenths of our citizens who have been born during the last
fifty years been absolutely dumb, the Republic would doubtless have
preserved its pristine purity. It is the interminable talk of
Congressmen and other leading citizens that is the source of all our
public woes. Talk is likewise the bane of private life. With dumb wives
there would be no need of divorce courts, and with dumb husbands home
might become a blessed reality instead of a poetic dream. And yet,
knowing full well that talk is a monster of such hideous meaning that
to be hated needs only to be constantly heard, Mr. EDISON has devised an instrument by
which the range of conversation is extended from a few feet to four
miles.
Our present vocal powers are always used to their full capacity.
Everybody talks with about the same volume of voice, and when the
aerophone comes into use, people will universally talk as loudly as the
instrument will permit. When ninety-nine people out of a hundred
converse with the aerophone, there will be such a roar of conversation
that the hundredth person, who may speak in his natural voice, cannot
be heard. We can only faintly imagine the horrible results of the
general introduction of the aerophone. Wives residing in suburban
Jersey villages will call to their husbands at their places of business
in the City, and require information as to subjects of purely domestic
interest. Mothers whose children have wandered out of sight will howl
over a four-mile tract of country direful threats as to the dying alive
which awaits James Henry and Ann Eliza unless they instantly come home.
From morning till midnight our
ears will be tortured with the uproar of aerophonic talk, and deaf men
will be looked upon as the favored few to whom nature has made life
tolerable.
The result will be the complete disorganization of society. Men and
women will flee from civilization and seek in the silence of the forest
relief from the roar of countless aerophones. Business, marriage, and
all social amusements will be thrown aside, except by totally deaf men,
and America will retrograde to the Stone Age with frightful rapidity.
Better is a dinner of raw turnips in a damp cave than a banquet at
DELMONICO's within hearing of ten thousand aerophones. Far better is it
to starve in solitude than to possess all the luxuries of civilization
at the price of hearing every remark that is made within a radius of
four miles. It may be too late to suppress the aerophone now, but at
least there is time to visit upon the head of its inventor the just
indignation of his fellow-countrymen.
John Gutenberg's Dream
The inventor of the printing press almost destroyed his invention. In a
dream he heard "an angel of light" tell him:
"Thou hast discovered the
bottomless pit... Oh, think of millions of souls corrupted by thine
achievement! The poison of fiends distilled into the souls of boys and
girls, making them old in the experience of sin... Destroy thy press,
for it shall be the pander of blasphemy and lust."
But God had different plans for Gutenberg, and the press was not
destroyed. In fact, the very first book Gutenberg produced in the
mid-1450's was a portion of the Holy Bible. Close to five billion
Bibles and portions of the Bible have been printed since then, for God
used that small invention to be a means of reaching the whole world
with the Gospel.
Yet many other pieces of literature have been produced which have been
a bane upon society. May God protect us and give us strength to avoid
the multitude of evils which assault mankind through not only the
printed page but the digital page as well.
A Great Title Page from the Year
1815
Gospel of Mark -- West Saxon
Version
Anyone from West Saxon? Here's an excerpt from the first few verses of
the Gospel of Mark, J.W. Bright's work of 1905:
John
the Baptist Prepares the Way
1 Her ys godspelles angyn Hælendes Cristes, Godes suna.
2 Swa awriten is on ðæs witegan bec Isaiam,
"Nu! ic asende minne engel
beforan ðinre
ansyne, se gegearwaþ ðinne weg beforan ðe.
3 Clypigende stefen on ðam westene, 'Gegearwiaþ Drihtnes weg, doþ rihte
his siðas.'"
4 Iohannes wæs on westene fulligende, and bodiende dæd-bote fulwiht, on
synna forgyfenesse.
5 And to him ferde eall Iudeisc rice, and ealle Hierosolima-ware; and
wæron fram him gefullode on Iordanes flode, hyra synna anddetende.
6 And Iohannes wæs gescryd mid oluendes hærum, and fellen gyrdel wæs
ymbe his lendenu; and gærstapan, and wudu hunig he æt,
7 And he bodode, and cwæþ, Strengra cymþ æfter me, ðæs ne eom ic wyrðe
ðæt ic his sceona þwanga bugende uncytte.
8 Ic fullige eow on wætere; he eow fullaþ on Halgum Gaste.
The Son of God, Jesus Christ
Names, Titles And Appellations
In Vol. 4 of The Self-Interpreting
Bible
(1896), the editors have included a very helpful table listing the
names and titles given to Jesus Christ throughout the Bible, from "The
Son" to "My All in All." Truly He is everything that is pure and
lovely, perfect in all He is and all He does. See this
excerpt.
|